Of course, I would probably have China win, because we would have the numbers (better agriculture and such!), the technology (we had gunpowder and steel!), and the tactics (more flexible, widespread use of unorthodox tactics, terror tactics, and the Art of War by Sun Tzu) to slaughter Roman legions. Because what seems to be history, is that China fought the Parthians too. That way, two huge empires would clash in the middle of Parthia. Because the Qin dynasty survived and the dynastic wars and successions never occurred. say there was a mysterious massive army they met. AOE is much more complex, with more units, more buildings, better chances to expand your base (always hated 'sandbagging' for second bases in C&C), more resources, and I think the engine is built better. I prefer it over C&C for a few different reasons. Say there were a few holdout empires, because there almost always are, but overall, Rome was halfway into Parthia.Īnd then. Age of Empires 2 has always seemed to me to be about the best game in the world. Then they would have Italians as legionaries, Germanic axemen, British chariots, etc, as auxiliaries, and Parthian cav and stuff too. Perhaps survived and taken over all around the Mediterranean like it did, and penetrated halfway into Parthia. What if, say, Rome had expanded and not collapsed.
I'm some random Chinese dude out there who likes Rome Total War.
0 kommentar(er)
